Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

SG&A Cost Management: Applied Materials vs. Fidelity National

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014890000000810500000
Thursday, January 1, 20158970000001102800000
Friday, January 1, 20168190000001710000000
Sunday, January 1, 20178900000001442000000
Monday, January 1, 201810020000001301000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199820000002667000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010930000003516000000
Friday, January 1, 202112290000003938000000
Saturday, January 1, 202214380000004118000000
Sunday, January 1, 202316280000002096000000
Monday, January 1, 202417970000002185000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials demonstrated a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.8 billion in 2023, reflecting a 100% rise from 2014. In contrast, Fidelity National Information Services experienced a more volatile trajectory, with expenses soaring to over 4 billion in 2022 before dropping to around 2.1 billion in 2023. This fluctuation suggests a strategic shift or market adaptation. Notably, the absence of data for Fidelity in 2024 hints at potential restructuring or reporting changes. As these industry leaders navigate economic challenges, their SG&A management will remain a key indicator of operational efficiency and strategic foresight.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025