__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 810500000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 1102800000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 1710000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 1442000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 1301000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 2667000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 3516000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 3938000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 4118000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 2096000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 2185000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials demonstrated a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.8 billion in 2023, reflecting a 100% rise from 2014. In contrast, Fidelity National Information Services experienced a more volatile trajectory, with expenses soaring to over 4 billion in 2022 before dropping to around 2.1 billion in 2023. This fluctuation suggests a strategic shift or market adaptation. Notably, the absence of data for Fidelity in 2024 hints at potential restructuring or reporting changes. As these industry leaders navigate economic challenges, their SG&A management will remain a key indicator of operational efficiency and strategic foresight.
Who Generates More Revenue? Applied Materials, Inc. or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs NetEase, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and VMware, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. or Block, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and NXP Semiconductors N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Incorporated
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation