Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Corcept vs. ADMA - A Decade of Growth

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386934916000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596836949000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474245240000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283562416000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292281289000
Tuesday, January 1, 201925910757100359000
Wednesday, January 1, 202035050817105326000
Friday, January 1, 202142896889122356000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024152848000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000184259000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Corcept Therapeutics vs. ADMA Biologics

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. Over the past decade, Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Corcept Therapeutics consistently outpaced ADMA Biologics, with SG&A expenses growing from approximately $35 million to $184 million, marking a staggering 426% increase. In contrast, ADMA Biologics saw a more modest rise from $4.8 million to $59 million, a 1,125% increase, albeit from a smaller base. This trend highlights Corcept's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities, while ADMA's growth reflects its strategic scaling efforts. As these companies continue to evolve, their financial strategies will play a pivotal role in shaping their market positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025