Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Genmab A/S vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Genmab vs BioCryst: A Decade of SG&A Spending Trends

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Genmab A/S
Wednesday, January 1, 2014746100079529000
Thursday, January 1, 20151304700091224000
Friday, January 1, 201611253000102413000
Sunday, January 1, 201713933000146987000
Monday, January 1, 201829514000213695000
Tuesday, January 1, 201937121000342000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202067929000661000000
Friday, January 1, 20211188180001283000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221593710002676000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232138940003297000000
Monday, January 1, 20243790000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: Genmab A/S vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding the financial strategies of leading companies is crucial. Over the past decade, Genmab A/S and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Genmab A/S consistently outpaced BioCryst in SG&A spending, with a staggering 3,297% increase by 2023 compared to BioCryst's 2,139% rise. This trend highlights Genmab's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially fueling its growth and market presence. Meanwhile, BioCryst's more conservative spending reflects a different strategic focus. As the biotech industry evolves, these financial decisions will play a pivotal role in shaping each company's future trajectory. Investors and industry analysts should closely monitor these trends to gauge the companies' operational efficiencies and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025