Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

GSK vs Alnylam: A Decade of SG&A Expense Trends

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.GSK plc
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260008246000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015606100009232000000
Friday, January 1, 2016893540009366000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171993650009672000000
Monday, January 1, 20183823590009915000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500011402000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000011456000000
Friday, January 1, 202162063900010975000000
Saturday, January 1, 20227706580008372000000
Sunday, January 1, 20237956460009385000000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: GSK plc vs Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, understanding the financial dynamics of major players is crucial. Over the past decade, GSK plc and Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, GSK's SG&A expenses have consistently been over 10 times higher than Alnylam's, reflecting its larger scale and market presence. However, Alnylam has demonstrated a remarkable growth trajectory, with its SG&A expenses increasing by over 1,600% from 2014 to 2023. This surge highlights Alnylam's aggressive expansion and investment in its operations. Meanwhile, GSK's expenses peaked in 2020, followed by a slight decline, indicating strategic cost management. This analysis provides a window into the financial strategies of these pharmaceutical giants, offering insights into their operational priorities and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025