__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Workday, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 263294000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 421891000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 582634000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 781996000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 906276000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 1238682000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 1514272000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 1647241000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 1947933000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 2452180000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 2841000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two tech giants: Applied Materials, Inc. and Workday, Inc., from 2014 to 2024.
Over the past decade, Workday, Inc. has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 980% from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Applied Materials, Inc. experienced a more modest growth of approximately 102% during the same period. This disparity highlights differing strategic priorities, with Workday investing heavily in expansion and customer acquisition.
For investors and analysts, these trends offer a window into each company's operational focus. While Workday's aggressive spending suggests a push for market dominance, Applied Materials' steady increase reflects a balanced approach to growth and cost management.
Who Generates More Revenue? Applied Materials, Inc. or Workday, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Workday, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Workday, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. or Synopsys, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Workday, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Dell Technologies Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fortinet, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Atlassian Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Autodesk, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs NetEase, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and VMware, Inc.