Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Atlassian Corporation

Comparing SG&A Cost Strategies: Applied Materials vs. Atlassian

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Atlassian Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201489000000075782000
Thursday, January 1, 2015897000000125319000
Friday, January 1, 2016819000000178849000
Sunday, January 1, 2017890000000253693000
Monday, January 1, 20181002000000339232000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019982000000484070000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201093000000568092000
Friday, January 1, 20211229000000688151000
Saturday, January 1, 202214380000001046064000
Sunday, January 1, 202316280000001376223000
Monday, January 1, 202417970000001488074000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Atlassian Corporation have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 102% from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Atlassian Corporation's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 1,864% over the same period. This stark difference highlights the aggressive expansion and scaling strategies employed by Atlassian, compared to the more measured approach of Applied Materials.

Strategic Implications

While Applied Materials maintains a consistent growth trajectory, Atlassian's rapid increase in SG&A expenses suggests a focus on scaling operations and market penetration. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025