| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Synopsys, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 608294000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 639504000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 668330000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 746092000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 885538000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 862108000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 916540000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 1035479000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 1133617000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 1299327000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 1427838000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Synopsys, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 102% from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Synopsys experienced a 135% increase over the same period.
While both companies have seen their SG&A costs rise, Synopsys has managed to keep its growth rate slightly lower than Applied Materials in recent years. This suggests a more efficient cost management strategy, especially considering the rapid expansion in the tech industry. As we look to the future, the ability to control these expenses will be pivotal in determining which company can sustain its competitive edge.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Synopsys, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Applied Materials, Inc. and Synopsys, Inc.'s Expenses
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Synopsys, Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or KLA Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. and Infosys Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and Synopsys, Inc. Allocate Funds
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or MicroStrategy Incorporated
Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Synopsys, Inc.