| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Dell Technologies Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 8906000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 8292000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 7850000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 13403000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 18569000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 20640000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 15819000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 14000000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 14655000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 14136000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 12857000000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive landscape of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2024, Dell consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking in 2019 with a staggering 20.64 billion dollars. In contrast, Applied Materials maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses rising steadily from 890 million dollars in 2014 to 1.797 billion dollars in 2024.
Dell's SG&A expenses are approximately 10 times higher than Applied Materials, reflecting its larger scale and broader market reach. However, Applied Materials' ability to keep costs relatively stable, with a 101% increase over the decade, highlights its efficiency. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies companies employ to balance growth and cost management in the tech industry.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Dell Technologies Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Dell Technologies Inc.: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Applied Materials, Inc. or Synopsys, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Applied Materials, Inc. or Dell Technologies Inc.: Who Invests More in Innovation?
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fortinet, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Atlassian Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Workday, Inc. Trends and Insights
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Autodesk, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance