Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A cost management in pharmaceuticals.

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015908040003425000
Friday, January 1, 20161864560006311000
Sunday, January 1, 20172550620009518000
Monday, January 1, 201826575800028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100046125000
Friday, January 1, 202139602800068486000
Saturday, January 1, 202236909000092032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023402466000117532000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Rhythm Pharmaceuticals or ACADIA Pharmaceuticals?

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has consistently outpaced Rhythm Pharmaceuticals in SG&A spending. From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 1,130%, peaking at $402 million in 2023. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals saw a more modest increase of around 9,600%, reaching $118 million in the same year.

Despite ACADIA's higher absolute spending, Rhythm's rapid growth in SG&A expenses reflects its aggressive expansion strategy. However, the challenge remains for both companies to optimize these costs while driving growth. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, the ability to manage SG&A expenses effectively will be a key differentiator in achieving long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025