Comparing SG&A Expenses: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited vs ImmunityBio, Inc. Trends and Insights

Teva vs. ImmunityBio: SG&A Expense Trends Unveiled

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201443260005078000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152262060004717000000
Friday, January 1, 2016943910005096000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017538210004986000000
Monday, January 1, 2018354630004214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019464560003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020713180003671000000
Friday, January 1, 20211352560003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221027080003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231296200003498000000
Monday, January 1, 20243702000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical landscape, understanding the financial dynamics of industry giants is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and ImmunityBio, Inc. over the past decade.

Teva's Consistent Leadership

Teva has consistently maintained a robust SG&A expenditure, peaking in 2016 with approximately $5.1 billion. Despite a gradual decline, Teva's expenses remained significantly higher than ImmunityBio's, underscoring its expansive operational scale.

ImmunityBio's Growth Trajectory

Conversely, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses have shown a remarkable upward trend, increasing by nearly 3000% from 2014 to 2023. This surge reflects the company's aggressive growth strategy and expanding market presence.

Insights and Implications

While Teva's expenses highlight its established market position, ImmunityBio's rising costs suggest a dynamic shift towards innovation and expansion. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating future prospects.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025