SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Spending Showdown

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480004326000
Thursday, January 1, 201590804000226206000
Friday, January 1, 201618645600094391000
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200053821000
Monday, January 1, 201826575800035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100071318000
Friday, January 1, 2021396028000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 2022369090000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 2023402466000129620000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. over the past decade. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has consistently outpaced ImmunityBio in SG&A spending, with a peak in 2023 where their expenses were approximately 210% higher. This trend highlights ACADIA's aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially fueling their market presence. In contrast, ImmunityBio's more conservative spending approach, with a notable spike in 2015, suggests a focus on cost efficiency. Understanding these spending patterns provides insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiency. As the biotech landscape evolves, monitoring SG&A trends will be key to predicting future growth trajectories.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025