Comparing SG&A Expenses: Workday, Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. Trends and Insights

SG&A Expenses: Workday vs Monolithic Power Systems

__timestampMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.Workday, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466755000263294000
Thursday, January 1, 201572312000421891000
Friday, January 1, 201683012000582634000
Sunday, January 1, 201797257000781996000
Monday, January 1, 2018113803000906276000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191335420001238682000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201616700001514272000
Friday, January 1, 20212261900001647241000
Saturday, January 1, 20222735950001947933000
Sunday, January 1, 20232757400002452180000
Monday, January 1, 20242841000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and power solutions, Workday, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Workday's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 830%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and market expansion. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems experienced a more modest increase of around 310%, indicating a steady yet controlled growth approach.

By 2023, Workday's SG&A expenses were nearly nine times higher than those of Monolithic Power Systems, highlighting the contrasting scales and operational strategies of these two industry players. The data for 2024 is incomplete, but the trends suggest continued divergence in their financial strategies. This comparison offers valuable insights into how different business models impact financial outcomes in the tech and power sectors.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025