__timestamp | Apple Inc. | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 66755000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 72312000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 83012000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 97257000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 113803000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 133542000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 161670000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 226190000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 273595000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 275740000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving tech industry, operational efficiency is key to maintaining a competitive edge. This analysis of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses from 2014 to 2023 offers a fascinating glimpse into the financial strategies of two industry leaders: Apple Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Apple's SG&A expenses have seen a steady increase, growing by approximately 117% over the decade. This reflects its expansive global operations and marketing prowess. In contrast, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. has experienced a remarkable 313% rise in SG&A expenses, albeit from a much smaller base, highlighting its aggressive growth strategy.
While Apple's expenses dwarf those of Monolithic Power Systems, the latter's rapid growth trajectory is noteworthy. The data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. This comparison underscores the diverse approaches companies take to scale and sustain their market positions.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Apple Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Apple Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for Apple Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Apple Inc. vs Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Apple Inc. or Keysight Technologies, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs GoDaddy Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and ANSYS, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Apple Inc. and Fortive Corporation
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Apple Inc. and Splunk Inc.
EBITDA Performance Review: Apple Inc. vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.