Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. or Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampIntra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141033767917986000
Thursday, January 1, 20151818728632480000
Friday, January 1, 20162475806368081000
Sunday, January 1, 201723666957169906000
Monday, January 1, 201830099855248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 201964947625354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020186363444433300000
Friday, January 1, 2021272611040583300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022358782000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 2023409864000887600000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Neurocrine Biosciences or Intra-Cellular Therapies?

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, Neurocrine Biosciences saw a staggering increase of nearly 500% in SG&A costs, peaking at approximately $888 million in 2023. In contrast, Intra-Cellular Therapies experienced a more moderate rise of around 390%, reaching about $410 million in the same year.

This data suggests that while both companies have expanded their operations, Neurocrine's growth in SG&A expenses has been more aggressive. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the companies' operational efficiencies and strategic priorities. Understanding these financial dynamics can provide deeper insights into each company's management effectiveness and future growth potential.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025