__timestamp | Apple Inc. | Salesforce, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 2764851000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 3437032000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 3951445000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 4777000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 5760000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 7410000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 9634000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 11761000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 14453000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 16079000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 | 15411000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving tech landscape, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and Salesforce, Inc. have showcased distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Apple's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 117%, reflecting its expansive growth and market dominance. In contrast, Salesforce's SG&A expenses skyrocketed by nearly 457%, underscoring its aggressive expansion strategy.
This analysis offers a glimpse into how these tech giants allocate resources to maintain their competitive edge.
Who Generates More Revenue? Apple Inc. or Salesforce, Inc.
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Apple Inc. or Salesforce, Inc.
Research and Development: Comparing Key Metrics for Apple Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or ASML Holding N.V.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs International Business Machines Corporation
Apple Inc. vs NVIDIA Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Apple Inc. and Broadcom Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Apple Inc. or Accenture plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Cisco Systems, Inc. Trends and Insights
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Apple Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.