__timestamp | Apple Inc. | International Business Machines Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 22472000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 19894000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 20279000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 19680000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 19366000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 18724000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 20561000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 18745000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 17483000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 17997000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 | 29536000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, the financial strategies of industry titans like Apple Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) offer a fascinating glimpse into their operational priorities. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, both companies have navigated the complexities of selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses with distinct approaches.
Apple's SG&A expenses have shown a steady upward trajectory, increasing by approximately 117% from 2014 to 2024. This reflects Apple's aggressive expansion and marketing strategies, crucial for maintaining its innovative edge. In contrast, IBM's SG&A costs have fluctuated, peaking in 2024 with a 31% increase from 2014, indicating strategic shifts in its business model.
These financial maneuvers underscore the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where adaptability and strategic foresight are key to sustaining growth and competitiveness.
Revenue Insights: Apple Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation Performance Compared
Cost of Revenue Trends: Apple Inc. vs International Business Machines Corporation
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Apple Inc. or International Business Machines Corporation
Comparing Innovation Spending: Apple Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or ASML Holding N.V.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Apple Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.
Apple Inc. vs NVIDIA Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Apple Inc. and Broadcom Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Apple Inc. or Accenture plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Cisco Systems, Inc. Trends and Insights
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Apple Inc. Compared to International Business Machines Corporation