Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs International Business Machines Corporation

Apple vs IBM: A Decade of SG&A Strategies

__timestampApple Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141199300000022472000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151432900000019894000000
Friday, January 1, 20161419400000020279000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171526100000019680000000
Monday, January 1, 20181670500000019366000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191824500000018724000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201991600000020561000000
Friday, January 1, 20212197300000018745000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222509400000017483000000
Sunday, January 1, 20232493200000017997000000
Monday, January 1, 20242609700000029536000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

A Tale of Two Giants: Apple Inc. vs IBM in SG&A Costs

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, the financial strategies of industry titans like Apple Inc. and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) offer a fascinating glimpse into their operational priorities. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, both companies have navigated the complexities of selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses with distinct approaches.

Apple's SG&A expenses have shown a steady upward trajectory, increasing by approximately 117% from 2014 to 2024. This reflects Apple's aggressive expansion and marketing strategies, crucial for maintaining its innovative edge. In contrast, IBM's SG&A costs have fluctuated, peaking in 2024 with a 31% increase from 2014, indicating strategic shifts in its business model.

These financial maneuvers underscore the dynamic nature of the tech industry, where adaptability and strategic foresight are key to sustaining growth and competitiveness.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025