A Professional Review of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation Compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

EBITDA Trends: Thomson Reuters vs. Booz Allen Hamilton

__timestampBooz Allen Hamilton Holding CorporationThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20145311440004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155204100003151000000
Friday, January 1, 20165061200002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175615240001495930891
Monday, January 1, 20185770610001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 20196637310001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 20207454240002757000000
Friday, January 1, 20218344490001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 20228268650003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239581500002950000000
Monday, January 1, 20241199992000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Comparative Analysis of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters vs. Booz Allen Hamilton

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding a company's financial health is crucial. EBITDA, or Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization, serves as a key indicator of operational performance. This analysis delves into the EBITDA trends of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation from 2014 to 2023.

Key Insights

Thomson Reuters consistently outperformed Booz Allen Hamilton in terms of EBITDA, with a peak in 2014, achieving nearly three times the EBITDA of Booz Allen Hamilton. However, Booz Allen Hamilton demonstrated a steady growth trajectory, with a remarkable 126% increase from 2014 to 2023. Notably, Thomson Reuters experienced fluctuations, with a significant dip in 2017, but rebounded by 2022. The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the need for cautious interpretation.

Conclusion

This comparative analysis underscores the resilience and growth potential of Booz Allen Hamilton, while Thomson Reuters remains a dominant force with its substantial EBITDA figures.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025