Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Thomson Reuters vs. Jacobs: A Decade of EBITDA Insights

__timestampJacobs Engineering Group Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20146990150004289000000
Thursday, January 1, 20155989320003151000000
Friday, January 1, 20164319540002999000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175277650001495930891
Monday, January 1, 20186063280001345686008
Tuesday, January 1, 20196040750001913474675
Wednesday, January 1, 20206850420002757000000
Friday, January 1, 202110191160001994296441
Saturday, January 1, 202212776490003010000000
Sunday, January 1, 202313920390002950000000
Monday, January 1, 20241255083000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: A Comparative Analysis

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding financial performance is crucial. This analysis focuses on the EBITDA trends of two industry giants: Thomson Reuters Corporation and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Thomson Reuters, a leader in information services, consistently outperformed Jacobs Engineering, a key player in the engineering sector, with an average EBITDA nearly three times higher. Notably, in 2014, Thomson Reuters achieved its peak EBITDA, surpassing Jacobs by over 500%. However, by 2023, the gap narrowed significantly, with Jacobs showing a remarkable 100% growth from its 2014 figures.

This data highlights the dynamic nature of financial performance across industries, emphasizing the importance of strategic adaptability. Missing data for 2024 suggests potential shifts in market dynamics, warranting close observation.

Stay informed with our in-depth financial insights, tailored for the discerning investor.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025