Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Expenses: Neurocrine vs. ADMA

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386917986000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596832480000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474268081000
Sunday, January 1, 201718092835169906000
Monday, January 1, 201822502922248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 201925910757354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202035050817433300000
Friday, January 1, 202142896889583300000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024752700000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000887600000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

A Tale of Two Biotechs: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing costs is crucial for success. This chart compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Neurocrine Biosciences has consistently outpaced ADMA Biologics in SG&A spending, reflecting its larger scale and broader market reach. In 2023, Neurocrine's SG&A expenses were nearly 15 times higher than ADMA's, highlighting its significant investment in administrative and sales functions. Over the decade, Neurocrine's expenses grew by approximately 490%, while ADMA's increased by about 1,120%, indicating a rapid expansion phase. This data provides a fascinating insight into how these companies allocate resources to support their growth strategies. Understanding these trends can offer investors and industry analysts a deeper perspective on the operational priorities of these biotech firms.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025