SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Corning Incorporated

Apple vs. Corning: SG&A Strategies Unveiled

__timestampApple Inc.Corning Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014119930000001211000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015143290000001523000000
Friday, January 1, 2016141940000001472000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017152610000001467000000
Monday, January 1, 2018167050000001799000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019182450000001585000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000001747000000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000001827000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000001898000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000001843000000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000001931000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and innovation, Apple Inc. and Corning Incorporated stand as titans, each with its unique approach to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Over the past decade, Apple has consistently demonstrated a robust growth trajectory, with SG&A expenses surging by approximately 117% from 2014 to 2023. This reflects Apple's strategic investments in marketing and administrative capabilities to maintain its competitive edge.

Conversely, Corning Incorporated, a leader in materials science, has shown a more stable SG&A expense pattern, with a modest increase of around 52% over the same period. This stability underscores Corning's focus on operational efficiency and cost management. Notably, the data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial forecasting. As these industry leaders continue to innovate, their SG&A strategies will remain pivotal in shaping their financial narratives.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025