SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and NetApp, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Apple vs. NetApp Over a Decade

__timestampApple Inc.NetApp, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014119930000002179200000
Thursday, January 1, 2015143290000002197400000
Friday, January 1, 2016141940000002099000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017152610000001904000000
Monday, January 1, 2018167050000002009000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019182450000001935000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000001848000000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000002001000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000002136000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000002094000000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000002136000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding a company's operational efficiency is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry titans: Apple Inc. and NetApp, Inc., from 2014 to 2024.

Apple Inc.: A Steady Climb

Apple's SG&A expenses have shown a consistent upward trend, growing by approximately 118% over the decade. This reflects Apple's strategic investments in marketing and administration, crucial for maintaining its market dominance. Notably, the expenses peaked in 2024, indicating a robust expansion strategy.

NetApp, Inc.: A Balanced Approach

In contrast, NetApp's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of around 13% over the same period. This stability suggests a focus on cost efficiency, aligning with its niche market strategy.

This comparative analysis highlights the diverse strategies of these tech giants, offering insights into their operational priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025