__timestamp | Apple Inc. | Tyler Technologies, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 108260000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 133317000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 167161000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 176974000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 207605000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 257746000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 259561000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 390579000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 403067000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 458345000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 | 458669000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, operational efficiency is key. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry titans: Apple Inc. and Tyler Technologies, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.
Apple's SG&A expenses have shown a consistent upward trend, growing by approximately 117% over the decade. From $12 billion in 2014 to a projected $26 billion in 2024, this reflects Apple's expansive growth and strategic investments in marketing and administration.
While Tyler Technologies operates on a smaller scale, its SG&A expenses have also increased significantly, rising over 300% from $108 million in 2014 to $458 million in 2023. This growth underscores Tyler's expanding footprint in the public sector software market.
Note: Data for Tyler Technologies in 2024 is currently unavailable, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial reporting.
Apple Inc. vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Apple Inc. vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Apple Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Apple Inc. and Fortive Corporation
Research and Development Investment: Apple Inc. vs Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Apple Inc. and Splunk Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Corpay, Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Apple Inc. and Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Apple Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ): SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and NetApp, Inc.