| __timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 99471000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 192782000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 239563000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 238623000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 524900000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 723100000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 708600000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 752100000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 925100000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 959700000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 | 1002400000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry giants can offer valuable insights. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation has consistently outpaced SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. in Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 56%, peaking at over $32 billion in 2023. In contrast, SS&C Technologies saw a more modest increase, with expenses rising from around $100 million in 2014 to nearly $960 million in 2023.
Microsoft's strategic investments in marketing and administration have fueled its growth, reflecting its dominant market position. Meanwhile, SS&C Technologies, though smaller in scale, has shown steady growth, indicating its resilience and adaptability in the financial services sector. Notably, data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial reporting and the need for continuous analysis.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Microsoft Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Microsoft Corporation vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and Leidos Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation or VeriSign, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Microsoft Corporation vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.