SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Sanofi and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Sanofi vs. BioCryst Pharmaceuticals

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sanofi
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610008565000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015130470009496000000
Friday, January 1, 2016112530009592000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171393300010164000000
Monday, January 1, 2018295140009934000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019371210009883000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020679290009390000000
Friday, January 1, 20211188180009555000000
Saturday, January 1, 202215937100010539000000
Sunday, January 1, 202321389400010765000000
Monday, January 1, 20249183000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Sanofi and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.

Sanofi's Steady Path

From 2014 to 2023, Sanofi's SG&A expenses have shown remarkable stability, fluctuating around the $10 billion mark. This consistency reflects Sanofi's strategic focus on maintaining operational efficiency while navigating the complexities of the global pharmaceutical market.

BioCryst's Rapid Growth

In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals has experienced a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, surging from approximately $7 million in 2014 to over $213 million in 2023. This nearly 30-fold increase underscores BioCryst's aggressive expansion and investment in market penetration.

Conclusion

These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical giants to balance growth and efficiency, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025