SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Thomson Reuters Corporation and United Airlines Holdings, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Thomson Reuters vs. United Airlines

__timestampThomson Reuters CorporationUnited Airlines Holdings, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201492090000001373000000
Thursday, January 1, 201588100000001342000000
Friday, January 1, 201682320000001303000000
Sunday, January 1, 201780790000001349000000
Monday, January 1, 201841310000001558000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201944130000001651000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203999000000459000000
Friday, January 1, 20211624000000677000000
Saturday, January 1, 202216220000001535000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023640000001977000000
Monday, January 1, 20242231000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of operational efficiency. This analysis compares the SG&A efficiency of Thomson Reuters Corporation and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. over the past decade.

Thomson Reuters Corporation

From 2014 to 2023, Thomson Reuters saw a significant reduction in SG&A expenses, dropping from a peak of $9.2 billion in 2014 to just $64 million in 2023. This represents a remarkable 99% decrease, highlighting the company's strategic cost-cutting measures and operational streamlining.

United Airlines Holdings, Inc.

Conversely, United Airlines experienced a more volatile trend. Starting at $1.37 billion in 2014, their SG&A expenses fluctuated, peaking at nearly $2 billion in 2023. This 44% increase reflects the airline industry's challenges, including fluctuating fuel prices and pandemic-related disruptions.

This comparative analysis underscores the diverse strategies and challenges faced by companies in different sectors.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025