Thomson Reuters Corporation or Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Thomson Reuters vs. Old Dominion

__timestampOld Dominion Freight Line, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141448170009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151535890008810000000
Friday, January 1, 20161523910008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171772050008079000000
Monday, January 1, 20181943680004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192061250004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201841850003999000000
Friday, January 1, 20212237570001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 20222588830001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 202328105300064000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A cost management of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. from 2014 to 2023.

Thomson Reuters Corporation

Thomson Reuters, a global leader in information services, has seen a significant reduction in SG&A expenses over the years. From a high of $9.2 billion in 2014, the company managed to cut costs by approximately 99% to just $64 million in 2023. This dramatic decrease reflects strategic cost-cutting measures and operational efficiencies.

Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.

Conversely, Old Dominion Freight Line, a prominent player in the freight industry, experienced a steady increase in SG&A expenses. Starting at $145 million in 2014, their costs rose by 94% to $281 million in 2023. This growth aligns with the company's expansion and increased operational scale.

In conclusion, while Thomson Reuters has excelled in reducing SG&A costs, Old Dominion's increase reflects its growth trajectory.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025