Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited or ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Teva vs. ACADIA: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014327480005078000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015908040004717000000
Friday, January 1, 20161864560005096000000
Sunday, January 1, 20172550620004986000000
Monday, January 1, 20182657580004214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193256380003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203886610003671000000
Friday, January 1, 20213960280003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 20223690900003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 20234024660003498000000
Monday, January 1, 20243702000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Teva's SG&A expenses have seen a significant decline of approximately 31%, dropping from $5.08 billion to $3.50 billion. This reduction reflects Teva's strategic cost-cutting measures amidst challenging market conditions. In contrast, ACADIA's SG&A expenses have surged by over 1,100%, from $32.7 million to $402.5 million, indicating aggressive investment in growth and expansion. While Teva focuses on efficiency, ACADIA's approach highlights its commitment to scaling operations. This divergence in strategies offers a fascinating insight into how two industry players navigate financial management to achieve their corporate goals.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025