Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or MicroStrategy Incorporated

Comparing SG&A cost strategies of two tech giants.

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.MicroStrategy Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014890000000321429000
Thursday, January 1, 2015897000000229254000
Friday, January 1, 2016819000000238202000
Sunday, January 1, 2017890000000254773000
Monday, January 1, 20181002000000291659000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019982000000277932000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201093000000229046000
Friday, January 1, 20211229000000255642000
Saturday, January 1, 20221438000000258303000
Sunday, January 1, 20231628000000264983000
Monday, January 1, 20241797000000278618000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and MicroStrategy Incorporated have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.8 billion in 2023. This represents a growth of nearly 100% over the period, reflecting their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, MicroStrategy Incorporated maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses hovering around $260 million in recent years, indicating a stable yet cautious financial strategy.

The Verdict

While Applied Materials, Inc. has embraced growth, MicroStrategy's consistent expense management highlights a focus on efficiency. The missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing strategic adjustments. As these companies evolve, their SG&A strategies will continue to shape their financial landscapes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025