| __timestamp | Electronic Arts Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1090000000 | 20488000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1033000000 | 20324000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1028000000 | 19198000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1112000000 | 19942000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1110000000 | 22223000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1162000000 | 23098000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1137000000 | 24709000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1281000000 | 25224000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1634000000 | 27725000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1705000000 | 30334000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1710000000 | 32065000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the competitive world of technology and gaming, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft Corporation and Electronic Arts Inc. have shown distinct strategies in optimizing these costs.
Microsoft, a tech behemoth, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 56% over the decade, reflecting its expansive growth and investment in innovation. In contrast, Electronic Arts, a leader in the gaming industry, has managed a more modest increase of around 57%, indicating a steady approach to cost management.
While Microsoft's expenses are significantly higher, reflecting its larger scale, both companies demonstrate strategic financial management. This comparison highlights the importance of balancing growth with cost efficiency, a lesson for businesses aiming to thrive in dynamic markets.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs Electronic Arts Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs Electronic Arts Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Garmin Ltd. Trends and Insights
Microsoft Corporation and Electronic Arts Inc.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or Gartner, Inc.
Comparing Innovation Spending: Microsoft Corporation and Electronic Arts Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or HubSpot, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. Trends and Insights
Microsoft Corporation or HP Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Microsoft Corporation vs Electronic Arts Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Microsoft Corporation or Microchip Technology Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?