__timestamp | AECOM | XPO Logistics, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 80908000 | 422500000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 113975000 | 1113400000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 115088000 | 1651200000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 133309000 | 1656500000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 135787000 | 1837000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 148123000 | 1845000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 188535000 | 2172000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 155072000 | 1322000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 147309000 | 678000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 153575000 | 167000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 160105000 | 134000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the competitive landscape of logistics and engineering, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. From 2014 to 2023, XPO Logistics and AECOM have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. XPO Logistics, with its expansive operations, saw a peak in SG&A expenses in 2020, reaching over 2.1 billion, before a significant reduction to 167 million by 2023. This represents a dramatic 92% decrease, highlighting their aggressive cost-cutting measures. In contrast, AECOM maintained a more stable approach, with expenses fluctuating modestly around 150 million annually, peaking at 188 million in 2020. This consistent management reflects a steady growth strategy. As we look towards 2024, AECOM's data remains available, while XPO's is yet to be reported, leaving room for speculation on future trends.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for XPO Logistics, Inc. and AECOM
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? XPO Logistics, Inc. or ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
XPO Logistics, Inc. vs Pool Corporation: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? XPO Logistics, Inc. or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: XPO Logistics, Inc. vs Saia, Inc.
XPO Logistics, Inc. and U-Haul Holding Company: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: XPO Logistics, Inc. vs AECOM