Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Tech Giants' SG&A Strategies: A Decade in Review

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014890000000513307000
Thursday, January 1, 2015897000000512414000
Friday, January 1, 2016819000000520300000
Sunday, January 1, 2017890000000553342000
Monday, January 1, 20181002000000573075000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019982000000621479000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201093000000670885000
Friday, January 1, 20211229000000749280000
Saturday, January 1, 20221438000000846340000
Sunday, January 1, 20231628000000920649000
Monday, January 1, 202417970000001039766000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Tech Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches to managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials saw a steady increase in SG&A spending, rising by approximately 102% from 2014 to 2023. This growth reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Cadence Design Systems exhibited a more conservative growth of around 79% over the same period, indicating a focus on efficiency and strategic cost management.

Interestingly, while Applied Materials continued its upward trajectory into 2024, Cadence's data for that year remains unavailable, leaving room for speculation on their future financial strategies. This comparison not only highlights the diverse financial philosophies of these tech giants but also offers valuable insights into their competitive positioning in the market.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025