__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 513307000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 512414000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 520300000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 553342000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 573075000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 621479000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 670885000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 749280000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 846340000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 920649000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 1039766000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches to managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials saw a steady increase in SG&A spending, rising by approximately 102% from 2014 to 2023. This growth reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. In contrast, Cadence Design Systems exhibited a more conservative growth of around 79% over the same period, indicating a focus on efficiency and strategic cost management.
Interestingly, while Applied Materials continued its upward trajectory into 2024, Cadence's data for that year remains unavailable, leaving room for speculation on their future financial strategies. This comparison not only highlights the diverse financial philosophies of these tech giants but also offers valuable insights into their competitive positioning in the market.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or KLA Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. and Infosys Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or MicroStrategy Incorporated
Applied Materials, Inc. or Synopsys, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison