Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence in Pharma Giants

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201456990000001213000
Thursday, January 1, 201550010000003425000
Friday, January 1, 201650020000006311000
Sunday, January 1, 201748490000009518000
Monday, January 1, 2018455100000028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019487100000036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020766100000046125000
Friday, January 1, 2021769000000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 2022781400000092032000
Sunday, January 1, 20237772000000117532000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Decade of SG&A: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is key. Over the past decade, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RYTM) have showcased contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, BMY's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 36%, peaking in 2022. This reflects their expansive market strategies and robust operational scale. In contrast, RYTM, a smaller player, has seen a staggering 9,600% increase in SG&A expenses, highlighting their aggressive growth and market penetration efforts. While BMY's expenses are consistently in the billions, RYTM's rise from a modest base underscores their dynamic expansion. This comparison not only illustrates the diverse strategies of these companies but also offers insights into their future trajectories in the competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025