ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs Novavax, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Strategic Growth

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Novavax, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386919928000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596830842000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474246527000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283534451000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292234409000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075734417000
Wednesday, January 1, 202035050817145290000
Friday, January 1, 202142896889298358000
Saturday, January 1, 202252458024488691000
Sunday, January 1, 202359020000468946000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expense Trends: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs Novavax, Inc.

In the ever-evolving biotech industry, understanding financial trends is crucial. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Novavax, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 1,100%. This reflects their strategic investments in operational expansion and market penetration. Meanwhile, Novavax, Inc. experienced a dramatic surge, particularly from 2020 onwards, with expenses skyrocketing by over 2,200%. This spike aligns with their aggressive push in vaccine development during the global pandemic. By 2023, Novavax's SG&A expenses were nearly eight times higher than ADMA's, highlighting their expansive operational scale. These trends underscore the dynamic nature of biotech financial strategies, where companies balance growth with operational costs to maintain competitive edges.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025