__timestamp | ADMA Biologics, Inc. | Novavax, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 4823869 | 19928000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 6745968 | 30842000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 8494742 | 46527000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 18092835 | 34451000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22502922 | 34409000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 25910757 | 34417000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 35050817 | 145290000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 42896889 | 298358000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 52458024 | 488691000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 59020000 | 468946000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving biotech industry, understanding financial trends is crucial. Over the past decade, ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Novavax, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, ADMA Biologics saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 1,100%. This reflects their strategic investments in operational expansion and market penetration. Meanwhile, Novavax, Inc. experienced a dramatic surge, particularly from 2020 onwards, with expenses skyrocketing by over 2,200%. This spike aligns with their aggressive push in vaccine development during the global pandemic. By 2023, Novavax's SG&A expenses were nearly eight times higher than ADMA's, highlighting their expansive operational scale. These trends underscore the dynamic nature of biotech financial strategies, where companies balance growth with operational costs to maintain competitive edges.
Eli Lilly and Company and Novavax, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Johnson & Johnson and ADMA Biologics, Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Incyte Corporation and Novavax, Inc.
Catalent, Inc. or Novavax, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. vs Novavax, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Comparing SG&A Expenses: ADMA Biologics, Inc. vs Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Novavax, Inc. Trends and Insights
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Novavax, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Xencor, Inc. and Novavax, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared