__timestamp | Leidos Holdings, Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 310000000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 232000000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 334000000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 552000000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 729000000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 689000000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 770000000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 860000000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 950000000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 942000000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 983000000 | 32065000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry giants can offer valuable insights. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation has consistently outpaced Leidos Holdings, Inc. in Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have grown by approximately 48%, reaching a peak of $30.3 billion in 2023. In contrast, Leidos has seen a more modest increase of around 204% over the same period, with expenses peaking at $950 million in 2022.
Microsoft's substantial investment in SG&A reflects its aggressive growth strategy and global market expansion. Meanwhile, Leidos' more conservative spending aligns with its focus on specialized government and defense contracts. The data for 2024 is incomplete, but the trends suggest a continued divergence in spending strategies. This comparison highlights the distinct paths these companies are taking in their respective industries.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Microsoft Corporation or Leidos Holdings, Inc.?
Cost of Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Microsoft Corporation vs Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation or VeriSign, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?