__timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | VeriSign, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 189488000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 196914000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 198253000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 211705000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 197559000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 184262000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 186003000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 188311000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 195400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 204200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 | 211100000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and VeriSign, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In contrast, VeriSign's SG&A costs have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of around 8% over the same period.
Microsoft's aggressive investment in sales and marketing aligns with its broader strategy to capture market share and innovate. Meanwhile, VeriSign's steady SG&A expenses suggest a more conservative approach, focusing on maintaining its core business operations. Notably, data for 2024 is missing for VeriSign, indicating potential changes in reporting or strategy. This analysis highlights the diverse strategies tech giants employ to balance growth and cost management.
Microsoft Corporation and VeriSign, Inc.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Microsoft Corporation vs VeriSign, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Gross Profit Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and VeriSign, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Microsoft Corporation vs VeriSign, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and Leidos Holdings, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Microsoft Corporation vs VeriSign, Inc.