Microsoft Corporation or VeriSign, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Microsoft vs. VeriSign: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampMicrosoft CorporationVeriSign, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201420488000000189488000
Thursday, January 1, 201520324000000196914000
Friday, January 1, 201619198000000198253000
Sunday, January 1, 201719942000000211705000
Monday, January 1, 201822223000000197559000
Tuesday, January 1, 201923098000000184262000
Wednesday, January 1, 202024709000000186003000
Friday, January 1, 202125224000000188311000
Saturday, January 1, 202227725000000195400000
Sunday, January 1, 202330334000000204200000
Monday, January 1, 202432065000000211100000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Microsoft vs. VeriSign: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and VeriSign, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy. In contrast, VeriSign's SG&A costs have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of around 8% over the same period.

Microsoft's aggressive investment in sales and marketing aligns with its broader strategy to capture market share and innovate. Meanwhile, VeriSign's steady SG&A expenses suggest a more conservative approach, focusing on maintaining its core business operations. Notably, data for 2024 is missing for VeriSign, indicating potential changes in reporting or strategy. This analysis highlights the diverse strategies tech giants employ to balance growth and cost management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025